Why we're building Seerian

I built Seerian because I lived the problem.

I spent years working inside a fund, managing investor relations, communicating with LPs, coordinating with auditors, and overseeing portfolio investments across companies, protocols, chains, and exchanges. I also ran and managed DeFi protocols, chains, exchanges, and market makers firsthand. I've sat on both sides of the table.

What I saw, again and again, was the same frustration: the data existed, but it was scattered across a dozen tools that didn't talk to each other. Market-level insights were everywhere, but portfolio-level insights were nowhere. When I needed to understand how our positions correlated with what was happening on-chain, in derivatives markets, or across the DeFi protocols we were invested in, I was stitching screenshots into spreadsheets. When I found something worth sharing with the team, it went into a Telegram message that disappeared by tomorrow.

The problem was never a lack of data. It was that none of the existing tools were built for the way a fund actually works: as a team, with shared context, looking at market data through the lens of their own portfolio.

Seerian aggregates the premium data sources institutional teams already pay for: Nansen, Arkham, CoinGlass, Dune, DefiLlama, and more, and layers a correlation engine and team workspace on top. But unlike every other dashboard in the space, we don't just show you the market. We show you the market as it relates to your positions, your thesis, your portfolio.

We're not replacing anyone's stack. We're the workspace that ties it all together, and gives your team the portfolio-level intelligence that no single provider can.

Institutional crypto research is broken into a dozen tabs.

[01]

Fragmented tooling.

Your team already pays for Nansen, Arkham, CoinGlass, Dune, and five more. Each one is powerful. None of them talk to each other. Analysts lose hours stitching screenshots into decks.

[02]

Isolated workflows.

Research lives in private browsers, personal spreadsheets, and Telegram DMs. PMs can't see what analysts are watching. Compliance can't audit a thing. When someone leaves, their research leaves with them.

[03]

Retail tools in an institutional seat.

Most "crypto dashboards" were built for individuals. Funds need projects, permissions, shared watchlists, and a workspace that treats a team like a team.

What we believe

We believe portfolio insights matter more than market insights.

Every dashboard in the space shows you the market. None of them show you the market through the lens of your portfolio. The question a PM actually asks isn't "what's the funding rate on ETH?" It's "how does this funding rate affect our positions?" That's what we build for.

We believe research is a team sport.

Most crypto tools are built for individuals. We build for organizations, with shared workspaces, role-based access, and projects that persist beyond any one person.

We believe aggregation beats specialization.

Nansen is excellent at on-chain analytics. Arkham is excellent at entity tracking. CoinGlass is excellent at derivatives. The insight lives in the connections between them, and in how they relate to what you hold.

We believe the workspace is the product.

Dashboards show data. Workspaces let teams act on it: organize research, share findings, build conviction, and move together.

We believe in earning trust, not claiming it.

Read-only integrations. EU-hosted infrastructure. Transparent security posture. We'd rather under-promise and over-deliver than the reverse.

The team behind Seerian

We're a small team building an institutional-grade product. Every feature ships with the care of people who use it themselves.

Global from day one

Seerian is built in Singapore and serves institutional teams across four regions.

Singapore · Middle East · Europe · North America

Get in touch

General inquiries: contact@coinseera.com

Security: security@coinseera.com

See Seerian with your team.

Request a demo